Cases 11 - 20 of 107
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv02356
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00873
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Removal - Civil Rights (Disability Act)
R&D Cross, Inc. v. Bank of America N.A.
as 8:2023cv00741
Plaintiff:
R&D Cross, Inc.
Defendant:
Bank of America N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Winmar Construction, Inc. v. The Academy of the Holy Cross et al
as 8:2023cv00360
Plaintiff:
Winmar Construction, Inc.
Defendant:
The Academy of the Holy Cross and ESF, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Caldwell v. The American National Red Cross
as 1:2023cv00267
Plaintiff:
Timothy J Caldwell
Defendant:
The American National Red Cross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Medical Malpractice
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv02935
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Tomlinson v. Horoho
as 8:2022cv01353
Plaintiff:
Ryan Tomlinson
Defendant:
Office of Personnell Management, Blue Cross Blue Shield Health Insurance, US Army Nurse Core. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Insurance Contract
Cross v. Nines
as 1:2022cv01300
Petitioner:
Donnell Cross
Respondent:
Warden Jeff Nines
Interested Party:
The Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00887
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
