Cases 11 - 20 of 36
Moss v. Dotson
as 7:2024cv00071
Petitioner:
Keith Edward Moss
Respondent:
Chadwick S. Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Keller v. Dotson
as 7:2024cv00066
Petitioner:
Micahel Wayne Keller
Respondent:
Chadwick S. Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00650
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00652
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lipford v. Dotson
as 7:2023cv00778
Petitioner:
Keon Deshea Lipford
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke and Chadwick S. Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilson v. Dotson
as 7:2023cv00687
Petitioner:
Christopher E. Wilson
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke and Chadwick S. Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thompson v. Dotson
as 7:2023cv00657
Petitioner:
Eugene L. Thompson
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke and Chadwick S. Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Laird v. Dotson
as 7:2023cv00601
Petitioner:
Richard Laird
Respondent:
Rick White and Chadwick S. Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gilbert v. Dotson
as 7:2023cv00574
Petitioner:
Jonathan Harvey Gilbert
Respondent:
The Commonwealth of Virginia and Chadwick S. Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vyas v. Dotson et al
as 7:2023cv00570
Petitioner:
Tarun Kumar Vyas
Respondent:
Harold Clarke, Sheriff Bryan Hutcheson, Jason Miyares and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
