Cases 11 - 20 of 24
JONES v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2018cv01023
Plaintiff:
CHARLES A. JONES
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD and OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Bradshaw et al
as 9:2017cv80266
Plaintiff:
Charles W. Jones
Defendant:
Ric Bradshaw, M. Ford, Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. United States Of America
as 1:2016cv22635
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Jones
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jones v. United States of America
as 1:2016cv22268
Petitioner:
Charles Edward Jones
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
FISHER v. JONES et al.
as 5:2016cv00108
Plaintiff:
ANGEL JAMES FISHER
Defendant:
CHARLES B JONES , SHULER and DAVID PIEKNIK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRENNER et al v. SCOTT et al
as 4:2014cv00110
Plaintiff:
JAMES DOMER BRENNER and CHARLES DEAN JONES
Defendant:
RICK SCOTT and PAMELA BONDI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BRENNER et al v. SCOTT et al
as 4:2014cv00107
Plaintiff:
JAMES DOMER BRENNER , CHARLES DEAN JONES , STEPHEN SCHLAIRET and others
Defendant:
RICK SCOTT , PAMELA BONDI , JOHN H ARMSTRONG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROVIO ENTERTAINMENT, LTD. v. ANGRY CLUBS, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv23619
Plaintiff:
ROVIO ENTERTAINMENT, LTD.
Defendant:
ANGRY CLUBS, LLC and PATRICK CHARLES SIMPSON-JONES
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Jones v. Israel et al
as 0:2013cv61704
Plaintiff:
Charles Sinclair Jones
Defendant:
Scott Israel and USG-7 Transporter William
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2012cv01677
Petitioner:
Charles E. Jones, Jr.
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
