Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Marks v. Cricket Communication Inc et al
as 2:2010cv00619
Plaintiff:
Chester Lee Marks
Defendant:
Cricket Communications Incorporated and Nick Vara
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marks v. Arizona Department of Economic Security Unemployment Insurance Program et al
as 2:2010cv00576
Plaintiff:
Chester Lee Marks
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Economic Security Unemployment Insurance Program and Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00520
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv01591
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Marks v. Social Security Administration et al
as 2:2009cv01569
Plaintiff:
Chester Lee Marks
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Western Program Services Center, Stephen Breen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00626
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Marks v. Labor Ready Southwest, Inc et al
as 2:2008cv01381
Plaintiff:
Chester Lee Marks
Defendant:
Labor Ready Southwest, Inc and Roy Eustey
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Marks v. Labor Ready Southwest, Inc et al
as 2:2008cv01380
Plaintiff:
Chester Lee Marks
Defendant:
Labor Ready Southwest, Inc and Robert Derway
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Marks v. Tower Cleaners et al
as 2:2008cv01383
Plaintiff:
Chester Lee Marks
Defendant:
Tower Cleaners and John Doe
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Marks v. Labor Ready Southwest, Inc et al
as 2:2008cv01382
Plaintiff:
Chester Lee Marks
Defendant:
Labor Ready Southwest, Inc and John Derose
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
