Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Southwestern Bell Telephone Company et al v. Iverson et al
as 3:2011cv02009
Plaintiff:
Southwestern Bell Telephone Company , AT&T Communications of Texas Inc , Indiana Bell Telephone Company Inc and others
Defendant:
Phil Iverson, Chris J Gose , Feature Films for Families Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GeoTag Inc v. Aromatique Inc et al
as 2:2010cv00570
Defendant:
Adidas America Inc, Kohl's Illinois Inc, Victoria's Secret Stores Inc and others
Counter Claimant:
VF Corporation, Academy LTD, Richemont North America Inc and others
Counter Defendant:
iCIMS, Inc.
Plaintiff:
GeoTag Inc
Not Classified By Court:
David Keyzer
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation v. AT&T Inc. et al
as 6:2010cv00067
Plaintiff:
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Defendant:
AT&T Inc., AT&T Mobility LLC f/k/a Cingular Wireless LLC and AT&T Wi-Fi Services, f/k/a Wayport, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv02436
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Clark v. Cingular Wireless Bargained Disability Benefits Plan No. 554
as 7:2009cv00177
Plaintiff:
Penny Clark
Defendant:
Cingular Wireless Bargained Disability Benefits Plan No. 554
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00818
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Castanon v. Cingular Wireless Employee Services, LLC.
as 3:2009cv00075
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Castanon
Defendant:
Cingular Wireless Employee Services, LLC.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv01560
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
