Cases 11 - 20 of 97
Howanietz v. City of Eugene et al
as 6:2022cv00788
Plaintiff:
Eric W. Howanietz
Defendant:
City of Eugene, Sarah Medary, William Solesbee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
v. City of Eugene et al
as 6:2022cv00787
Defendant:
City of Eugene, Sarah Medary, William Solesbee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Bondick v. City of Eugene Police, et al.
as 6:2022cv00668
Plaintiff:
Robert Bondick
Defendant:
City of Eugene Police, Lane County District Attorneys Office, Eugene City Prosecutors Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Payne v. City of Eugene et al
as 6:2022cv00471
Plaintiff:
Anzhelika Payne
Defendant:
City of Eugene, Lane County, Jairo Solorio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bogan v. City of Eugene et al
as 6:2022cv00438
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Bogan
Defendant:
City of Eugene, Zacchary Te'o, Jacob Roberson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Grimsley v. Nike Corp. et al
as 1:2021cv10745
Plaintiff:
Robert Grimsley
Defendant:
Nike Corp., Phil Knight doing business as Nike Corp., Amazon Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. City of Eugene et al
as 6:2021cv01803
Plaintiff:
Rickie A. Miller
Defendant:
City of Eugene, Eugene Police Department, Det. Anne McIntyre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Santiago v. Tykol et al
as 6:2021cv01715
Plaintiff:
Ofelia Hernandez Santiago
Defendant:
Samuel Tykol, City of Eugene, John Doe Supervisors 1-3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bondick v. Lane County et al
as 6:2021cv01312
Plaintiff:
Robert Bondick
Defendant:
Lane County, City of Eugene, City of Eugene Police and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv01293
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
