Cases 11 - 20 of 162
Thurman King v. City of Rockford, MI, et al
as 22-2038
Plaintiff / Appellee:
THURMAN KING
Defendant / Appellant:
CITY OF ROCKFORD, MI, ROCKFORD, MI DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, ZACHARY ABBATE, Officer, in his individual capacity and others
Moore et al v. Lauer et al
as 3:2022cv50354
Plaintiff:
Stephene Moore and "PM"
Defendant:
Bradley Lauer, The City Of Rockford, Scott Dimke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. McNiece et al
as 3:2022cv50350
Plaintiff:
Tyris Jones
Defendant:
Dominik McNiece, Rockford Police Department and City Of Rockford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones et al v. McNiece et al
as 3:2022cv50347
Plaintiff:
Tyris Jones
Defendant:
Officer Dominik McNiece, Unknown John Doe Rockford Police Officers and City Of Rockford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Macklin v. City Of Rockford et al
as 3:2022cv50342
Plaintiff:
Renard D. Macklin
Defendant:
City Of Rockford, Dan Oshea, New Towne Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2412
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
J. Doe v. State of Illinois, et al
as 22-8011
Petitioner:
J. DOE
Respondent:
STATE OF ILLINOIS, CITY OF ROCKFORD, ILLINOIS, WINNEBAGO COUNTY, ILLINOIS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2283
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv50196
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Davis v. City of Rockford, Illinois et al
as 3:2022cv50145
Plaintiff:
Denise Davis
Defendant:
City of Rockford, Illinois and Anthony Curran
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
