Cases 11 - 20 of 156
Brye v. City of Stockton
as 2:2023cv00343
Plaintiff:
Shawn Brye
Defendant:
City of Stockton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Carroll et al v. City of Stockton
as 2:2023cv00194
Plaintiff:
Kisana Carroll and T.R.
Defendant:
City of Stockton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gaeta et al v. City of Stockton et al
as 2:2023cv00077
Plaintiff:
Alex Gaeta and Tressie Gaeta
Defendant:
City of Stockton, Eric Jones and Kyle Ribera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PC) Iseli v. City of Stockton et al
as 2:2023cv00013
Plaintiff:
Branden Willie Iseli
Defendant:
City of Stockton and State of California
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Iseli v. State of California et al
as 2:2022cv02171
Plaintiff:
Branden Willie Iseli
Defendant:
State of California and City of Stockton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kellogg v. City of Stockton
as 2:2022cv02154
Plaintiff:
Jurriea Kellogg
Defendant:
City of Stockton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PC) Iseli v. State of California et al
as 2:2022cv01933
Plaintiff:
Branden Willie Iseli
Defendant:
State of California and City of Stockton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Hinojosa v. Superior Court of California et al
as 2:2022cv01780
Petitioner:
Robert George Hinojosa
Respondent:
Superior Court of California, County of San Joaquin and City of Stockton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Merriman v. Jones et al
as 2:2022cv00877
Plaintiff:
Dominique Merriman
Defendant:
Gena Jones, Pederson and City of Stockton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PS) Smith v. City of Stockton, et al.
as 2:2022cv00408
Plaintiff:
Teresa Y Smith and Teresa Y. Smith
Defendant:
City of Stockton, Stockton Police Dept, Braga and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
