Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00870
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Vargas v. Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois et al
as 2:2019cv01230
Defendant:
Safeco Insurance Company Of Illinois, Scott Clements and Scot Clements
Plaintiff:
Christina Vargas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Obeya v. Sessions III et al
as 2:2018cv01586
Petitioner:
Clement Obeya
Respondent:
Executive Office of Immigration Reviews for Las Vegas Nevada, Attorney General Jefferson B Sessions III and Robert M Culley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Clement v. Colvin et al
as 2:2017cv02787
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill, Comerica Bank and Xerox Corporation
Plaintiff:
Mark Clement
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Clement v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2017cv02730
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and State of Nevada
Petitioner:
Kathryn Arlene Clement
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sample v. Otter
as 2:2017cv02633
Defendant:
Clement Leroy Otter
Plaintiff:
Jeromy Bryan Sample
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Garmong v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency et al
as 3:2017cv00444
Defendant:
Shelly Aldean, Jim Baetge, Marsha Berkbigler and others
Plaintiff:
Mr. Gregory Garmong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01630
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00685
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Clements v. United States of America
as 2:2010cv01391
Movant:
Joseph Danielle Clements
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
