Cases 11 - 20 of 27
McCoy et al v. Colorado Civil Rights Division et al
as 1:2016cv00649
Plaintiff:
Leila McCoy and Clyde McCoy, II
Defendant:
Colorado Civil Rights Division, Rufina (I) Hernandez and Rufina Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
McCoy et al v. Bennette Valley Investors et al
as 1:2016cv00443
Plaintiff:
Leila McCoy and Clyde McCoy
Defendant:
Bennette Valley Investors, Dan May, Dan (I) May and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Harvey v. Buck et al
as 1:2014cv00835
Petitioner:
Clyde Harvey
Respondent:
Ken Buck and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harvey v. State of Colorado et al
as 1:2013cv03324
Plaintiff:
Clyde Harvey
Defendant:
State of Colorado, Weld County District Attorney and Weld County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01672
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01245
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Harvey v. Weld County District Atty et al
as 1:2012cv00966
Plaintiff:
Clyde Harvey
Defendant:
Weld County District Atty and Weld County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Thurmond v. Dick et al
as 1:2012cv00629
Defendant:
Clyde M. Dick and Hudson Correctional Facility
Plaintiff:
Nick L. Thurmond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Coffey et al
as 1:2012cv00097
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Clyde Coffey, Sandra Brown, USA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2409
Harris v. Lumbard et al
as 1:2011cv02461
Plaintiff:
Clyde Harris
Defendant:
Laura Franklin, Michael Lumbard and Noel Ikedo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
