Cases 11 - 20 of 100
Muhammad v. Cook County Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2026cv10597
Plaintiff:
Ahaid Aaron Muhammad
Defendant:
Cook County Department of Corrections
:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramos et al v. Cook County State Attorney Office et al
as 1:2026cv10561
Plaintiff:
Marcus Ramos and Lametra Phillips
Defendant:
Cook County State Attorney Office, Umbrella Eileen O'Neill Burke, Thomas J. Dart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv10517
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Donte Henderson v. Cook County, Illinois, et al
as 26-2800
Plaintiff:
DONTE HENDERSON
Defendant:
COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, THOMAS J. DART, UNKNOWN SHERIFF DOCTORS and others
Flowers et al v. Cook County et al
as 1:2026cv10430
Plaintiff:
Frederick Flowers
Defendant:
Cook County, Eileen Burke, Charles Beach II and others
:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv10431
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Hughes v. Hardimon et al
as 1:2026cv10443
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Hughes, III
Defendant:
D. Hardimon, Cook County, Cook County Jail and others
:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv10437
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Metcalf v. Cook County Health
as 1:2026cv10344
Plaintiff:
Wesley Metcalf
Defendant:
Cook County Health
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Ramone Kellum v. Thomas Dart, et al
as 26-2771
Plaintiff:
RAMONE KELLUM, as Special Administrator for Raymond Kellum
Defendant:
THOMAS J. DART and COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
