Cases 11 - 20 of 58
McMurray et al v. Mohr et al
as 1:2020cv00689
Plaintiff:
Nate McMurray, Ronald Coons and Pauline Grabeki
Defendant:
Ralph M. Mohr and Jeremy Zellner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coon v. Wolofsky et al
as 8:2020cv00554
Defendant:
Brian P. Wolofsky, Swan Landing Associates, L.P., Richard L. Tenance and others
Plaintiff:
Ryan Coon
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Avent v. Estervez et al
as 1:2020cv01197
Defendant:
P.O. Briggs, P.O. Estervez, Unidentified P.O. John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Reuben Avent
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Thompson et al
as 8:2019cv01601
Defendant:
Lillie A. Thompson, XYZ Corporation, Lillie Coon and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Baxter v. Piccolo et al
as 6:2019cv06722
Defendant:
Timothy Heath, L. Butler, Peter Schmitt and others
Plaintiff:
Jason I. Baxter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baxter v. Piccolo et al
as 6:2019cv06637
Defendant:
Timothy Heath, L. Butler, Peter Schmitt and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Baxter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Friedman et al v. Coon et al
as 1:2019cv07484
Plaintiff:
Let There Be Neon City, Inc. and Jeffrey Friedman
Defendant:
Let There Be Light - Neon and Stuart Coon
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Coon v. Merola et al
as 1:2019cv00394
Plaintiff:
Donald James Coon
Defendant:
Jane/John Does and Frank Merola
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Avent v. Meilunas et al
as 1:2019cv00070
Defendant:
P.O. Briggs, NYS Division of Parole, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Reuben Avent
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Coons et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 6:2018cv06288
Plaintiff:
Donald Coons and Carmen Coons
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., Depuy, Inc., DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
