Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Rogers #372900 v. Mindlin et al
as 1:2017cv00527
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Rogers #372900
Defendant:
Lyle Mindlin and Corizon Medical Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marsh #343384 v. Corizon Medical Services
as 2:2016cv00167
Plaintiff:
Debvonne Lamar Marsh #343384
Defendant:
Corizon Medical Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vanderlaan #295236 v. Aho et al
as 2:2016cv00162
Plaintiff:
Michel Vanderlaan #295236
Defendant:
Vicki Aho, J. Wilbanks, Dale Asche and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harrison #156814 v. Deeren et al
as 1:2016cv00336
Plaintiff:
Larry E. Harrison #156814
Defendant:
Bryan Deeren, Patricia Willard, William E. Schmuggerow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maldonadodeher #735228 v. Corizon Medical Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00021
Plaintiff:
Jose Ruben Maldonadodeher #735228
Defendant:
Corizon Medical Services, Inc., Melissa LaPlant and Penny Filion
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel #537193 v. Johns et al
as 2:2014cv00245
Plaintiff:
Allen D. Daniel #537193
Defendant:
Phillip Johns, Ben Mercier, Chad Lacount and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hollmon #222991 v. Woods et al
as 2:2014cv00196
Plaintiff:
David Hollmon #222991
Defendant:
Michael Brotoski, Corizon Medical Services and Melissa LaPlaunt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel #537193 v. Johns et al
as 2:2014cv00166
Plaintiff:
Allen D. Daniel #537193
Defendant:
Phillip Johns, Ben Mercier, Chad Lacount and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abraham v. Kent County Jail Administration et al
as 1:2012cv01233
Plaintiff:
Ronald James Abraham
Defendant:
Kent County Jail Administration and Corizon Medical Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sleighter v. Kent County Jail Administration et al
as 1:2012cv01008
Plaintiff:
Bradley Keith Sleighter
Defendant:
Kent County Jail Administration and Corizon Medical Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
