Cases 11 - 20 of 104
Crowder v. Lumpkin et al
as 4:2022cv02267
Plaintiff:
Joe Crowder
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Lorie Davis, Warden Crosby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Freeman v. Director, TDCJ-CID et al
as 1:2022cv00100
Plaintiff:
Antonio Freeman
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID, Lincoln Heritage Insurance Company, TDCJ Director Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Freeman v. Director, TDCJ-CID et al
as 6:2022cv00240
Plaintiff:
Antonio Freeman
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID, Unknown Dickerson, Unknown Crosby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ortiz v. Crosby County Sheriff's Office et al
as 5:2022cv00089
Plaintiff:
Jesse Ortiz
Defendant:
Crosby County Sheriff's Office, Michael Sells and Ralls Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv01547
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Newton v. Crosby County 72nd District Court et al
as 5:2022cv00039
Plaintiff:
Marvin E Newton
Defendant:
Crosby County 72nd District Court, DFPS and Molina Crystal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv01088
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00686
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Arnold Ray Lamotte, Jr., et al v. Eddie Murgic, et al
as 5:2021cv00034
Plaintiff:
Arnold Ray Lamotte, Jr. and Emperor Royalty Family Elite Specialist Transportation
Defendant:
April Crosby, Eric Cornelius, Traveloko, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dapco Services, Inc. v. Crosby Construction Services, Inc.
as 3:2020cv00332
Plaintiff:
Dapco Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Crosby Construction Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
