Cases 11 - 20 of 39
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv10019
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Local 94-00094A-94B, International Union of Operating Engineers, AFL-CIO v. Cushman & Wakefield
as 1:2020cv05408
Defendant:
Cushman & Wakefield
Plaintiff:
Local 94-94A-94B, International Union of Operating Engineers, AFL-CIO
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Brown v. Cushman & Wakefield
as 1:2020cv05411
Defendant:
Cushman & Wakefield
Plaintiff:
Local 94-94A-94B, International Union of Operating Engineers, AFL-CIO
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Navel v. Cushman & Wakefield Global, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00298
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Navel
Defendant:
C&W Facility Services, Inc., Macerich Property Management Company, LLC, Cushman & Wakefield Global, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MVNY Holdings, LLC et al v. Double Black Ventures, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv10640
Plaintiff:
Arie Maor, Dana Gordon, Gabriel Zelwin and others
Defendant:
Darryl Romanoff, Stuart Romanoff, PCG Mishawaka, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ra
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv05614
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 020
Wiltz v. New York University et al
as 1:2018cv11168
Defendant:
Franklin Diaz, Collins Building Service, Inc., New York University and others
Plaintiff:
Randall Wiltz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv09073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ed
Wiltz v. New York University et al
as 1:2018cv00123
Plaintiff:
Randall Wiltz
Defendant:
New York University , Franklin Diaz, Erin Lynch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1932
Searl v. Cushman & Wakefield, Inc.
as 1:2017cv04236
Plaintiff:
James Searl
Defendant:
Cushman & Wakefield Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
