Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv02311
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dawson v. Premo et al
as 6:2015cv00568
Petitioner:
Craig Thomas Dawson
Respondent:
Jeff Premo, State Parole Board and Washington County D.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01613
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Thomas v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2011cv01560
Defendant:
City of Portland, D.A. Office, Detective Waddell and others
Plaintiff:
Dan Martin Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv01163
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Garcia v. City of Portland et al
as 3:2008cv00788
Plaintiff:
Theodore Cleofas Garcia, Jr.
Defendant:
City of Portland, State of Oregon, D.A. of Multnomah County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Hovde Financial, Inc v. McKinney et al
as 6:2007cv01822
Plaintiff:
Hovde Financial, Inc, Hovde Financial, Inc and Hovde Financial, Inc
Defendant:
Rory McKinney, Joseph Gulash, D.A. Davidson & Co., and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Tetrick v. Hillsboro Police Department, et al.
as 3:2007cv01584
Plaintiff:
John Robert Tetrick
Defendant:
Jane and John Doe, Hillsboro Police Department, Washington County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wells Fargo Investments, LLC v. Fleck et al
as 3:2007cv01031
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Investments, LLC and Wells Fargo Investments, LLC
Defendant:
James S. Fleck, Jason P. Fleck, Kerry E. Snook and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
