Cases 11 - 20 of 35
James et al v. Luvanis S.A.
as 7:2015mc00352
Plaintiff:
Charles B.H. James and Louise D.B. James
Defendant:
Luvanis S.A.
Cause Of Action: M 18-304 Administrative Subpoena Proceedings
Brown et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv04126
Plaintiff:
Angelo Branch, Helen Brown and D.B.
Defendant:
City of New York and John and Jane Doe 1 through 15
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Estate of D.B. v. Thousand Islands Central School District et al
as 7:2015cv00484
Plaintiff:
Estate of D.B.
Defendant:
Thousand Islands Central School District, Thousand Islands Central School District Board of Education, Frank House and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00012
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415
S.B. et al v. New York City Department Of Education,
as 1:2014cv10193
Plaintiff:
S.B. and D.B.
Defendant:
New York City Department Of Education,
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2014cv09361
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Xiamen Jiasheng Foreign Trade Co. Ltd. v. D.B. Plus Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv05063
Plaintiff:
Xiamen Jiasheng Foreign Trade Co. Ltd.
Defendant:
D.B. Plus Inc. , David Saad , Joseph Saad and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rodgers v. Drew et al
as 9:2014cv00406
Plaintiff:
Danyl Rodgers
Defendant:
D.B. Drew, Hemendez, Unknown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2013cv03596
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
D.B. et al v. New York City Department of Education
as 1:2012cv04833
Plaintiff:
D.B. and M.C.
Defendant:
New York City Department of Education
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
