Cases 11 - 20 of 22
GAYLE et al v. COUNTY OF ESSEX et al
as 2:2014cv00291
Plaintiff:
NORMA GAYLE , D.S. and CARMEN GAYLE
Defendant:
COUNTY OF ESSEX , ESSEX COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE , GIUSSEPE FORGIONE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00024
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv04588
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv04133
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
W.S. & D.S. v. MOUNT OLIVE TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION
as 2:2011cv04264
Plaintiff:
W.S. & D.S.
Defendant:
MOUNT OLIVE TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401
Herring v. Prime Services/ D.S., Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv01721
Plaintiff:
CAROL HERRING
Defendant:
Prime Services/ D.S., Inc. , BROADWAY HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT LLC, MICHAEL KONIG and others
Cross_claimant:
Prime Services/ D.S., Inc.
Cross_defendant:
BROADWAY HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT LLC and MICHAEL KONIG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
R.S. AND D.S. ON BEHALF OF E.S. v. MONTGOMERY TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION
as 3:2010cv05265
Plaintiff:
R.S. AND D.S. ON BEHALF OF E.S.
Defendant:
MONTGOMERY TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401
ARTIS v. SCHULTZ et al
as 1:2009cv00986
Plaintiff:
RANDOLPH ARTIS
Defendant:
PAUL SCHULTZ, SCOTT DODRILL, H. LAPPIN and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
BAYONNE BOARD OF EDUCATION v. D.S. et al
as 2:2008cv01774
Plaintiff:
BAYONNE BOARD OF EDUCATION
Defendant:
D.S. and A.S.
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
D.S. et al v. BAYONNE BOARD OF EDUCATION
as 2:2008cv01726
Plaintiff:
D.S. and A.S.
Defendant:
BAYONNE BOARD OF EDUCATION
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
