Cases 11 - 20 of 279
SHANNON v. KELLE et al
as 1:2024cv00268
Plaintiff:
DANTAVIS LAMARCUS SHANNON
Defendant:
KELLE, JUGG, MARTINEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GARY v. INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2024cv00378
Plaintiff:
LOREN D. GARY
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE and DENNIS REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2024cv00210
Plaintiff:
HERBERT JOHNSON
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, J.D. BALLENGER and COCHRAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GEE v. REAGLE
as 1:2024cv00409
Petitioner:
DAMON T. GEE
Respondent:
DENNIS REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
NEATHERY v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2024cv00292
Plaintiff:
AUSTIN NOAH NEATHERY
Defendant:
CHRISTINA REAGLE, DENNIS REAGLE, ANDREW COLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BREWER v. REAGLE
as 1:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN R. BREWER
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BURK v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2024cv00250
Plaintiff:
SCOTT A. BURK
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE and TRENT ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GARY v. INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2024cv00315
Plaintiff:
LOREN D. GRAY and LOREN D. GARY
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE and DENNIS REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GARY v. INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
LOREN D. GARY
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE and DENNIS REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRIER v. INTERNOLL INVESTIGATIONS et al
as 1:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
JACOB BRIER
Defendant:
INTERNOLL INVESTIGATIONS and DENNIS REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
