Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Freeman v. Director of Corrections CDCR et al
as 4:2018cv06056
Petitioner:
Ronald L Freeman
Respondent:
Warden DVI Tracy and Director of Corrections CDCR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Young v. Paramo et al
as 3:2015cv01054
Petitioner:
Jerry Wayne Young
Respondent:
Paramo and Director of Corrections (CDCR)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Charles Simpson v. The Director of the CDCR
as 2:2015cv00360
Petitioner:
Charles Simpson
Respondent:
The Director of the CDCR
Charles Simpson v. The Director of the CDCR
as 2:2014cv09649
Petitioner:
Charles Simpson
Respondent:
The Director of the CDCR
Charles Simpson v. The Director of the CDCR
as 2:2014cv09080
Petitioner:
Charles Simpson
Respondent:
The Director of the CDCR
Jeffrey Smith v. Director of the CDCR
as 14-56339
Petitioner - Appellant:
JEFFREY HAROLD SMITH
Respondent - Appellee:
DIRECTOR OF THE CDCR
Marlon Siguenza v. Minerva Cotero, et al
as 13-56186
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARLON EDGARDO SIGUENZA
Defendant - Appellee:
MINERVA COTERO, Law Library LTA/Free Staff, A. VARIZ, Superisor/Principal of Law Library, CHERYL K. PLILER, Deputy Director of the CDC and others
Susan Polk v. Linda Daly, et al
as 13-15602
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SUSAN MAE POLK
Defendant - Appellee:
LINDA DALY, SHARON ANDERSON, ROBERT CAMPBELL and others
Carl Love v. Matthew Cate, et al
as 12-15133
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARL R. LOVE
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW CATE, Director, Secretary of CDCR, S. R. MORE, Warden at DVI Reception Center, R. VELLA, Capt. at CSP Corcoran and others
Christine Blantz v. CDCR, et al
as 11-56525
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTINE BLANTZ
Defendant - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, Division of Correctional Health Care Services, JAMES RUDDY, individually and in his official capacity as medical auditor for CDCR, ELIZABETH DOS SANTOS CHEN, individually and in her official capacity as Chief Medical Officer for the Southern Region of Clinical Support for the CDCR and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
