Cases 11 - 20 of 41
Pierce (ID 58077) v. Waddington et al
as 5:2014cv03223
Petitioner:
Christopher Pierce
Respondent:
Douglas Waddington and Attorney General of Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pierce v. Waddington et al
as 5:2014cv03173
Petitioner:
Christopher Pierce
Respondent:
Douglas Waddington and Attorney General of the State of Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pierce (ID 58077) v. Waddington et al
as 5:2014cv03098
Petitioner:
Christopher Pierce
Respondent:
Douglas Waddington and Attorney General of Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Taylor (ID 40023) v. Roberts et al
as 5:2013cv03210
Plaintiff:
Vincent Taylor
Defendant:
Ray Roberts, Douglas Waddington, Randy Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierce (ID 58077) v. Waddington et al
as 5:2013cv03204
Petitioner:
Christopher Pierce
Respondent:
Douglas Waddington and Attorney General of Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pierce v. Waddington et al
as 5:2013cv03160
Petitioner:
Christopher Pierce
Respondent:
Douglas Waddington and Attorney General of Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Garza v. Correct Care Solutions, et al
as 13-3222
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSE GARZA
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, MARLENE ABLE, Director of Nurses, Larned Correctional Mental Health Facility, DOUGLAS WADDINGTON, Warden, Larned Correctional Mental Health Facility and others
Pierce (ID 58077) v. Waddington et al
as 5:2013cv03108
Petitioner:
Christopher Pierce
Respondent:
Douglas Waddington and Attorney General of Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Parrish (ID 25121) v. Waddington et al
as 5:2012cv03221
Plaintiff:
Daniel Joseph Parrish
Defendant:
Douglas Waddington and John Shields
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parrish v. Lines, et al
as 12-3222
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL JOSEPH PARRISH
Defendant - Appellee:
ANGIE LINES and DOUGLAS WADDINGTON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
