Cases 11 - 20 of 200
Hufstetler v. USA
as 1:2022cv00407
Petitioner:
Daniel Hufstetler
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Towne v. Gardner et al
as 1:2022cv00342
Plaintiff:
Brenda Towne
Defendant:
William Gardner, David Scanlan, Harri Hursti and others
Hatem v. Progressive Northern Insurance Company
as 1:2022cv00336
Plaintiff:
Daniel Hatem
Defendant:
Progressive Northern Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Dyer v. Cook Incorporated et al
as 1:2022cv00227
Plaintiff:
Daniel E Dyer
Defendant:
Cook Incorporated, Cook Medical Incorporated, Cook Group Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00197
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Elliott v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv00109
Plaintiff:
Danielle Elliott
Defendant:
Atrium Medical Corporation, Marquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC. and Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Lessard v. Lowell, MA Police Deparment et al
as 1:2021cv01074
Plaintiff:
Steven Lessard
Defendant:
Lowell, MA Police Dept, Daniel Desmarris, Nicolas Dokos and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Casanova v. Ramos
as 1:2021cv00851
Plaintiff:
Daniel Casanova
Defendant:
FNU Ramos and NH State Prison, Commissioner
Not Classified By Court:
NH Attorney General - Notice Only - Civil (Court Use Only) and NH Department of Corrections - Notice Only - Civil (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alley v. FCI Berlin
as 1:2021fp01026
Petitioner:
Daniel Alley
Respondent:
FCI Berlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00968
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
