Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Maher v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2014cv00112
Plaintiff:
David M. Maher
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00811
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Omes v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2013cv00375
Plaintiff:
David M Omes
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
MBCI v. Cannon et al
as 5:2012cv00713
Plaintiff:
MBCI
Defendant:
Vern E Cannon , Vernn Cannon Company , Eva L Cannon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00185
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Titsworth v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2011cv00589
Plaintiff:
David M Titsworth
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Passons et al v. Aviva Life and Annuity Company et al
as 5:2011cv00422
Plaintiff:
Gary A Passons , Gary A Passons MD PC , Anat V Shah and others
Defendant:
Aviva Life and Annuity Company , American General Life Insurance Company , David Cline Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Berryhill v. Henry et al
as 6:2010cv00091
Plaintiff:
Lavern Berryhill
Defendant:
Brad Henry, Jari Askins, Drew Edmondson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones et al v. Medtronic Inc et al
as 5:2009cv01056
Plaintiff:
David M Jones and Wilma B Jones
Defendant:
Medtronic Inc, Medtronic International Technology Inc and Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Doyle v. Nordam Group, Inc., The et al
as 4:2009cv00531
Plaintiff:
David M Doyle, David M Doyle and David M Doyle
Defendant:
Nordam Group, Inc., The and Nordam Transparency Division of Texas, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
