Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Muck v. Harney County et al
as 2:2015cv01674
Defendant:
City of Burns, Oregon, Harney County, Terri Presley and others
Plaintiff:
Douglas T Muck
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01569
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00817
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Nickerson v. Rosenblum et al
as 1:2015cv00684
Defendant:
Debbie April Brown, Richard Evens, Jr., Deana Harris and others
Plaintiff:
Dale Ray Nickerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barton v. OR. Attorney General
as 6:2013cv02154
Petitioner:
David M. Barton
Respondent:
OR. Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perales v. United States of America et al
as 6:2012cv00520
Defendant:
G. Auerbach, Brian Beckwith, Roy Blunt and others
Plaintiff:
Azael Dythian Perales
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Donaldson v. Williams et al
as 2:2012cv00080
Defendant:
Daniel Ahern, Deanna Berman, Eric Blaine and others
Plaintiff:
Danny Wayne Donaldson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud
United States of America v. Martinez
as 6:2011cv06258
Defendant:
David M. Martinez
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402 IRS: Petition to Enforce IRS Summons
Debo et al v. BAC Home Loans Servicing LP et al
as 1:2011cv03078
Defendant:
BAC Home Loans Servicing LP and Recontrust Company N.A.
Plaintiff:
David M. Debo and Maureen M. Debo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Buckland v. MERS
as 1:2011cv03053
Plaintiff:
David M. Buckland
Defendant:
MERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
