Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Miller et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv00452
Plaintiff:
Anna A. Miller and David Miller
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. , American Medical Systems Holdings, Inc. , Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith v. Mount Olive Correctional Center et al
as 2:2012cv00788
Plaintiff:
Gregg Dulaney Smith
Defendant:
Mount Olive Correctional Center, James Rubenstein, Samuel Keenan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LoBello v. Rubenstein et al
as 2:2011cv00299
Plaintiff:
Salvatore LoBello
Defendant:
Jim Rubenstein , David Ballard , Steve Caudill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LaRue v. Coleman et al
as 2:2011cv00072
Plaintiff:
William A. LaRue
Defendant:
Terry Coleman , Christopher Hess , David Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blake v. Hart et al
as 2:2010cv01324
Plaintiff:
Robert Blake
Defendant:
Abbie Hart, Price Maze and David Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blake v. Adkins et al
as 2:2010cv01331
Plaintiff:
Robert Blake
Defendant:
Valorie Adkins, Price Maze, David Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blake v. State Shope Supviser, et al
as 2:2010cv01123
Plaintiff:
Robert Blake
Defendant:
State Shope Supviser, David Miller, Price Maze and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Humple v. Rubenstein et al
as 2:2010cv00082
Plaintiff:
Robert Humple
Defendant:
Jim Rubenstein, Charlene Sotak, David Ballard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blake v. Maze et al
as 2:2010cv00031
Plaintiff:
Robert Blake
Defendant:
Price Maze, David Miller, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blake v. Maze et al
as 2:2009cv01153
Plaintiff:
Robert Blake
Defendant:
Price Maze, David Miller, Nate Kendrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
