Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Flaherty v. Ryan et al
as 2:2011cv00802
Plaintiff:
Francis J Flaherty
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Devon Dickinson and Arizona Correctional Industries
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McPhaul v. Ryan et al
as 2:2011cv00788
Plaintiff:
Olas McPhaul, Jr.
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Devon Dickinson and Arizona Correctional Industries
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McReaken v. Ryan et al
as 2:2011cv00783
Plaintiff:
John Daniel McReaken
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Devon Dickinson and Arizona Correctional Industries
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberts v. Ryan et al
as 2:2011cv00796
Plaintiff:
James Roberts
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Devon Dickinson and Arizona Correctional Industries
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Little v. Ryan et al
as 2:2011cv00781
Plaintiff:
Peter James Little
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Devon Dickinson and Arizona Correctional Industries
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Ryan et al
as 2:2011cv00797
Plaintiff:
Delano Moore, Jr.
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Devon Dickinson and Arizona Correctional Industries
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunn v. Ryan et al
as 2:2011cv00795
Plaintiff:
Ryan Dunn
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Devon Dickinson and Arizona Correctional Industries
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Terranova v. Ryan et al
as 2:2011cv00789
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lee Terranova
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Devon Dickinson and Arizona Correctional Industries
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Ryan et al
as 2:2011cv00787
Plaintiff:
Christopher David Thompson
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Devon Dickinson and Arizona Correctional Industries
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cisco v. Ryan et al
as 2:2011cv00785
Plaintiff:
Daniel S Cisco
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Devon Dickinson and Arizona Correctional Industries
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
