Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Hall v. Milwaukee County Jail Facility
as 2:2014cv01542
Plaintiff:
Dion Darren Hall
Defendant:
Milwaukee County Jail Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall v. Clarke
as 2:2014cv01538
Petitioner:
Dion Darren Hall
Respondent:
David Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01444
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Mathews, Dion et al v. Raemisch, Rick et al
as 3:2010cv00742
Plaintiff:
Dion Mathews and Mustafa-El K.A. Ajala
Defendant:
Rick Raemisch , Peter Huibregtse , Gary Boughton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAKE, DION C. v. USA
as 3:2010cv00132
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
DION C. LAKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
The Estate of Robert J Dion v. Anchor Packing Company Inc et al
as 2:2009cv01193
Plaintiff:
The Estate of Robert J Dion
Defendant:
Anchor Packing Company Inc, AP Green Industries Inc, Argo Packing Co and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
The Estate of Robert J Dion v. Anchor Packing Company Inc et al
as 2:2009cv01190
Plaintiff:
The Estate of Robert J Dion
Defendant:
Anchor Packing Company Inc, AP Green Industries Inc, Argo Packing Co and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
The Estate of Robert J Dion v. Anchor Packing Company Inc et al
as 2:2009cv01194
Plaintiff:
The Estate of Robert J Dion
Defendant:
Anchor Packing Company Inc, AP Green Industries Inc, Argo Packing Co and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Lacy v. Department of Child Support Enforcement
as 1:2007cv01067
Plaintiff:
Dion X Lacy
Defendant:
Department of Child Support Enforcement
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
