Cases 11 - 20 of 70
Casillas v. Lumpkin
as 5:2023cv00889
Petitioner:
Robert M. Casillas
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mendez v. Lumpkin et al
as 5:2023cv00868
Petitioner:
Jesse Mendez
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin and Texas Board of Pardons/Paroles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Padilla v. Lumpkin
as 1:2023cv00776
Petitioner:
Guadalupe Padilla
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Roberson v. Lumpkin
as 6:2023cv00235
Petitioner:
Stevie Andre Roberson
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Thomas v. Perez, Jr. et al
as 9:2023cv00068
Plaintiff:
Kenneth A. Thomas
Defendant:
Sergio J Perez, Jr., Heather M. Glover, Bryan Collier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alvarado v. Lumpkin
as 5:2023cv00407
Petitioner:
Joseph Alvarado, III
Respondent:
Director TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Green v. Lumpkin
as 5:2023cv00036
Petitioner:
Lowell Q. Green
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adams v. Layton et al
as 6:2022cv00436
Plaintiff:
Alex Adams
Defendant:
Unknown Layton, Use of Force Office, University of Texas Medical Branch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grohoske v. Lopez
as 6:2022cv01133
Petitioner:
David Lester Grohoske
Respondent:
Director TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin and Sheriff Joe Lopez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Roberts Jr. v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2022cv00933
Petitioner:
Gary Gene Roberts Jr.
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
