Cases filed in New Jersey
Cases 11 - 18 of 18
MATTHEWS v. WARDEN JOHN DOE #1 et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv02517
Plaintiff: BARRY LEWIS MATTHEWS
Defendant: WARDEN JOHN DOE #1, JOHN DOE #2, JOHN DOE #3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCNAMARA v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv03651
Plaintiff: JOHN T. MCNAMARA, JR.
Defendant: STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCNAMARA, JR. v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2010cv03651
Plaintiff: JOHN T. MCNAMARA, JR.
Defendant: STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
D. v. MICKENS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv02902
Plaintiff: TROY D.
Defendant: FELIX MICKENS, JOHN OR JANE DOE #1, JOHN OR JANE DOE #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
NIKE, INC. v. JOHN DOE 1 et al
as 2:2010cv01908
Plaintiff: NIKE, INC.
Defendant: JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2, JOHN DOE 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
MANFREDI v. TARGET CORPORATION et al
as 2:2008cv06399
Plaintiff: CHERRYEE MANFREDI
Defendant: TARGET CORPORATION, DOES 1 THROUGH 7, DOES 8 THROUGH 10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Type: Torts - Injury Both
BURNS v. WARDEN ERIC TAYLOR et al
as 1:2008cv04234
Plaintiff: MICHAEL C. BURNS
Defendant: WARDEN ERIC TAYLOR, CAMDEN COUNTY, CAMDEN COUNTY BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FAZIO et al v. JC PENNEY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv01539
Plaintiff: ELIZABETH FAZIO and ANTHONY FAZIO
Defendant: JC PENNEY, DOES 1 THROUGH 7, DOES 8 THROUGH 10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?