Cases 11 - 20 of 25
SEAWRIGHT v. BANNING et al
as 2:2018cv04811
Defendant:
OFFICER PATRICK BANNING and JOHN JOHN/JANE DOE OFFICERS 1-7
Plaintiff:
KEVIN SEAWRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reed v. Mercatili et al
as 3:2017cv02052
Plaintiff:
Noah P. Reed
Defendant:
Ronald Mercatili, Gary N. Fedor, John Doe State Trooper X and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ESTATE OF ERIN FELDSHER et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2017cv02447
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF ERIN FELDSHER and MICHAEL FELDSHER
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and JOHN DOE OFFICER(S)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TAYLOR v. LICIARDELLO et al
as 2:2015cv02208
Plaintiff:
COREY TAYLOR
Defendant:
THOMAS LICIARDELLO, JOHN DOE OFFICER 1, JOHN DOE OFFICER 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NICHOLAS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2014cv06610
Plaintiff:
VICTOR NICHOLAS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, KEVIN CLARK and JOHN DOES OFFICERS 1-100
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CEPEDA et al v. LANCASTER CITY et al
as 5:2014cv02429
Plaintiff:
LUIS CEPEDA and MARK CEPEDA
Defendant:
LANCASTER CITY, ERIC PANONE, ADAM WEBER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHRISTINE v. ROSATI et al
as 5:2013cv01241
Plaintiff:
JACOB CHRISTINE
Defendant:
ROSATI, JOHN DOE OFFICER #1, JOHN DOE OFFICER #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CHRISTINE v. ROSATI et al
as 2:2013cv01241
Plaintiff:
JACOB CHRISTINE
Defendant:
ROSATI, JOHN DOE OFFICER #1, JOHN DOE OFFICER #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOOKER v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2012cv00402
Plaintiff:
JOHN BOOKER
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, SEAN C. ALIVERA, CHRISTOPHER J. LUCIANO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HENDRICKS v. SWAN et al
as 5:2011cv07394
Plaintiff:
RICHARD ALAN HENDRICKS
Defendant:
PETER SWAN, DANIEL TROXELL, JAKE CARRICK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
