Cases 11 - 20 of 50
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 b3 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION v. BURGESS
as 1:2017cv00925
Defendant:
DOYLE BURGESS
Plaintiff:
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Hixson et al v. Gottschalk et al
as 3:2017cv00166
Plaintiff:
Janet Pichon Hixson and Richard Hixson
Defendant:
Stephanie Gottschalk, Margery Justice, Ryan Jacobs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STONE v. WRIGHT et al
as 2:2017cv00092
Defendant:
CITY OF CLINTON, INDIANA and DOYLE T. WRIGHT
Plaintiff:
HEATHER STONE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doyle v. Concord Township, Elkhart County, Indiana, et al
as 3:2017cv00065
Plaintiff:
Kevin Doyle
Defendant:
Concord Township, Elkhart County, Indiana and Trustee, Concord Township, Elkhart County, Indiana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv03439
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 b3 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv03111
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Strickland v. Heartland Recreational Vehicles LLC
as 3:2016cv00672
Plaintiff:
Arthur Doyle Strickland
Defendant:
Heartland Recreational Vehicles LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
COX et al v. DOYLE & FOUTTY, P.C.
as 1:2016cv02092
Plaintiff:
TAMARA COX and WILLIAM COX
Defendant:
DOYLE & FOUTTY, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Tullos v. Biomet, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00508
Plaintiff:
Doyle E Tullos
Defendant:
Biomet, Inc. , Biomet Manufacturing Corporation , Biomet U.S. Reconstruction, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
