Cases 11 - 20 of 64
Valdez v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2020cv08062
Defendant:
Unknown Chiu, Unknown Arredondo, Calvin Robinson and others
Plaintiff:
Ysidro Juan Valdez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunn et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv01842
Plaintiff:
Theresa Dunn and Earl Dunn
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dunn v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv00869
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Joyce Dunn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pakter et al v. Dunne et al
as 2:2018cv04559
Defendant:
Martina Dunne and www.hyperfly.com
Plaintiff:
Kerstin Pakter and Pascal Pakter
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv04180
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Dunn v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv02875
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Susan Dunn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Outley v. Penzone et al
as 2:2018cv02753
Defendant:
Unknown Graffious, Unknown Haley, Unknown Tennyson and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Dewayne Outley, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
George H Johnson Revocable Trust v. Arizona Corporation Commission et al
as 2:2018cv02325
Defendant:
Andy Tobin, Justin Olson, Boyd Dunn and others
Plaintiff:
George H Johnson Revocable Trust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dunn v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv03879
Plaintiff:
Cynthia L Dunn
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dunn v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv03776
Plaintiff:
Christina Dunn
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
