Cases 11 - 20 of 36
Sosa et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2017cv09753
Plaintiff:
Diana Sosa and Princella Espinat
Defendant:
City of New York, Michael Dye, Isabella Byrnes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dye v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2017cv06710
Plaintiff:
Adam Franklin Dye
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Ruggiero v. City of Cortland, New York et al
as 5:2017cv00790
Plaintiff:
Gerald Ruggiero
Defendant:
City of Cortland, New York , County of Cortland, New York , Brian Tobin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dye v. Noeth
as 6:2017cv06277
Petitioner:
Matthew Dye
Respondent:
Joseph H. Noeth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Trustees of The National Retirement Fund v. North Jersey Skein Dyeing Company, Inc. et al
as 7:2016cv09475
Plaintiff:
Trustees of The National Retirement Fund
Defendant:
North Jersey Skein Dyeing Company, Inc., Putnam Realty Company and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1381
Dye v. Kate Spade & Company et al
as 1:2016cv05759
Plaintiff:
Mark Dye
Defendant:
Kate Spade & Company , Kate Spade, LLC , Macy's, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Donald v. Kopiec
as 1:2016cv02952
Plaintiff:
Dye Donald
Defendant:
Jerzy Kopiec
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Houston v. Nurse Administration Five Points C.F. et al
as 1:2015cv00636
Plaintiff:
Douglas Houston
Defendant:
Nurse Administration Five Points C.F., Salotti, Guardia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Butler v. Dye et al
as 1:2015cv00765
Plaintiff:
Donald W. Butler
Defendant:
Steve Dye and Officer Miles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 1:2014cv02276
Plaintiff:
Daryl Evans, Twila Adair, Amy Adamson and others
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362 E.R.I.S.A.: Liability for Termination of Single Employer Plans
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
