Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01061
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Tomey v. Tomey et al
as 1:2015cv00942
Plaintiff:
Mark Steven Tomey, Sr.
Defendant:
Nora Ellen Tomey, Andrew Goeb, Sharon Rose and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986
Smith et al v. United States of America
as 1:2013cv02212
Plaintiff:
Sedrick L. Smith , Xavier E. Smith and Wilhemina Butler-Smith
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Wrongful Death
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01806
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00822
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ganin v. Constellation Energy Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00409
Plaintiff:
Barbara Ganin
Defendant:
Constellation Energy Group, Inc., Constellation Energy Group, Inc., Mayo A. Shattuck, III and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
United States of America, ex rel., Conover v. Anthony et al
as 1:2009cv00356
Plaintiff:
Robert S. Conover
Defendant:
Todd M. Anthony , Robert M. Brawley , Steven D. Buchanan and others
Movant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Smith v. Dinisio et al
as 8:2008cv02990
Petitioner:
Charles E. Smith
Respondent:
Dinisio, State Of Maryland and Talbot County
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2008cv01487
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Law Office of Dobbs & Baker v. Smith et al
as 8:2008cv00813
Plaintiff:
Law Office of Dobbs & Baker
Defendant:
Charles E. Smith, United States of America and Law Office of David M. Wasser
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
