Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Medina et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv03121
Defendant:
City of New York, John and Jane Doe 1 through 10 and Angelo Rubano
Plaintiff:
E.H., Don-Nisha Hope, Donald Hope and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
E.H. et al v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv02694
Plaintiff:
C.H. and E.H.
Defendant:
John Does 1-5, Police Officer Anthony Palladino, Police Officer John Sciascia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wilder v. Department of Correction N. Y.C. et al
as 1:2010cv03187
Plaintiff:
Marion B. Wilder
Defendant:
Department of Correction N. Y.C., E.H. Bailey, Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maldonado v. Mr. Williams et al
as 1:2009cv08435
Plaintiff:
Manuel Maldonado
Defendant:
Mr. Williams, Mr. La Bruzzo, Commissioner of N.Y.C.-Department of Correction and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
S.E.C. v. Euro Security Fund, et al
as 1:1998cv07347
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Ron Sleegers, International Structure Consulting B.V., Franck Hakkert and others
Receiver:
Celia Goldway Barenholtz
Intervenor:
HEARD LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Shabazz v. Goodman et al
as 1:2009cv03613
Plaintiff:
Malik Shabazz
Defendant:
Budd Goodman, Laura A. Ward, John E.H. Stackhouse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. E.H. Yost & Co., LLC et al
as 7:2008cv01261
Plaintiff:
Philip D. Anderson
Defendant:
E.H. Yost & Co., LLC and E.H. Yost
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Dennis et al v. Sheriff's Department of Dutchess County et al
as 1:2007cv05741
Plaintiff:
Richard Dennis and Susan Dennis
Defendant:
Sheriff's Department of Dutchess County, Dutchess County, Ralph Franceschi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
