Cases 11 - 20 of 128
Zahaf v. New York Department of Corrections and Community Supervision et al
as 1:2022cv00291
Plaintiff:
Kheira Zahaf
Defendant:
New York Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Anthony J. Annucci, Dale Artus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hunt v. Eckert
as 9:2022cv00171
Petitioner:
Brian Lee Hunt
Respondent:
Anthony Annucci and Stewart Eckert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lewis v. Eckert
as 1:2021cv01022
Petitioner:
Diamond Lewis
Respondent:
Superintendent Eckert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Votto v. Raina et al
as 1:2021cv05982
Plaintiff:
Peter Votto
Defendant:
Robin Raina, Steve Hamil, Pavan Bhalla and others
Nominal Defendant:
EBIX, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 sv
Carrino v. Eckert
as 7:2021cv05909
Petitioner:
Justin Carrino
Respondent:
Stewart Eckert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Quiros v. Eckert et al
as 6:2021cv06466
Respondent:
Stewart T. Eckert and New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision
Petitioner:
Gerardo Quiros
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Calvo v. Raina et al
as 1:2021cv04380
Defendant:
George W. Hebard, Robin Raina, Steven M. Hamil and others
Nominal Defendant:
Ebix, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Javier Calvo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 sv
Quiros v. Eckert et al
as 1:2021cv00770
Respondent:
Stewart T. Eckert, New York State Department of Corrections and New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision
Petitioner:
Gerardo Quiros
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Phelan v. Eckert
as 9:2021cv00573
Respondent:
S. Eckert
Petitioner:
Kenneth J. Phelan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Eckert v. Suffolk County Sheriff et al
as 2:2021cv02650
Plaintiff:
Kevin Andrew Eckert, Jr.
Defendant:
Suffolk Count Sheriff, Erol Toulon and Suffolk County Riverhead Correctional Facility Medical Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
