Cases 11 - 20 of 80
Meyers v. United States of America
as 2:2022cv01819
Plaintiff:
Elli Meyers
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Houston v. Lombardo et al
as 2:2022cv01607
Plaintiff:
Matthew Travis Houston
Defendant:
Joe Lombardo, Carolyn Goodman, Miranda M. Du and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clark v. Riley et al
as 2:2022cv01541
Plaintiff:
Cleophus C. Clark
Defendant:
Det. G. Riley, Det. Ellis, Officer V. Ferlini and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Ellis v. Kijakazi
as 2:2022cv01443
Plaintiff:
Alicia Renee Ellis
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Vance v. Bank of America, N.A.
as 2:2021cv02149
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Vance, Bob McClelland, JR, Lemurial Mayo and others
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Karajelian et al v. Affinity Lifestyles.com, Inc.
as 2:2021cv00465
Plaintiff:
Mindy Charusarn, Michelle Karajelian and Traci Ellis
Defendant:
Affinity Lifestyles.com, Inc. doing business as Real Water
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ellis v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00047
Plaintiff:
Cailin Ellis
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Women's Health, LLC and Duramed Pharmaceuticals, Inc. doing business as Teva Women's Health, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ellis v. Wheaton Van Lines, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv02187
Defendant:
Wheaton Van Lines, Inc., Superior Moving Service, Inc. and Wheaton Van Lines, Inc. doing business as Wheaton World Wide Moving
Plaintiff:
Karen Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Umansor v. Williams et al
as 2:2020cv00819
Defendant:
Mereda, Malcom, Trainor and others
Plaintiff:
Edgar Umansor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis v. Howell
as 2:2019cv02164
Defendant:
Howell
Plaintiff:
Darral Ellis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.