Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Birchfield et al (TV2)
as 2:2016cv00019
Plaintiff:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
Defendant:
Jacqueline R Birchfield , Donald Birchfield , Eastman Credit Union and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00004
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Eastman Chemical Company v. SGS North America, Inc. et al (JRG2)
as 2:2015cv00344
Plaintiff:
Eastman Chemical Company
Defendant:
SGS North America, Inc. and SGS Minerals Services
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Carty v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al
as 3:2015cv01186
Plaintiff:
Gary Carty
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company , Eastman Chemical Company Welfare Benefit Program and Eastman Chemical Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00169
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Greene v. Eastman Credit Union
as 2:2014cv00386
Plaintiff:
Matthew D. Greene
Defendant:
Eastman Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Eastman Chemical Company v. URS Corporation
as 2:2010cv00218
Plaintiff:
Eastman Chemical Company
Defendant:
URS Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Eastman v. Pope et al
as 3:2010cv00139
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Eastman
Defendant:
Michael R. Pope, Michael R. Pope, Crete Carrier Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Marcum et al v. Eastman Credit Union et al
as 2:2010cv00010
Plaintiff:
Linda G Marcum and Larry Marcum
Defendant:
Eastman Credit Union, Johnson City Towing, Kenneth Carroll and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
