Cases 11 - 20 of 75
Eastman v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2017cv03046
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Eastman
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Inc , Johnson & Johnson Services Inc and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coleman v. CCI et al
as 3:2017cv01866
Plaintiff:
Alvester Coleman
Defendant:
CCI, Minton & Brown PLLC, Robert M Minton and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00137
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2017cv00047
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2017cv00048
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv02558
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157 Motion for Withdrawal of Reference
Hawk Technology Systems, LLC v. Eastman Chemical Company
as 2:2016cv00684
Plaintiff:
Hawk Technology Systems, LLC
Defendant:
Eastman Chemical Company
Consol_defendant:
7-Eleven, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Flores v. Allstate Texas Lloyd's et al
as 4:2016cv01090
Plaintiff:
Maria Flores
Defendant:
Allstate Texas Lloyd's and Ashley Eastman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Texas Patent Imaging LLC v. Eastman Kodak Company
as 2:2016cv00357
Plaintiff:
Texas Patent Imaging LLC
Defendant:
Eastman Kodak Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Flanagan et al v. Baylor College Of Medicine et al
as 4:2016cv00625
Plaintiff:
Andrea Flanagan and Ruth Harrison
Defendant:
Baylor College Of Medicine, Mariam Chackco, Peggy Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
