Cases 11 - 20 of 134
Cox v. Iqbal, et al
as 3:2022cv00708
Plaintiff:
Ezekiel J. Cox
Defendant:
Unknown, Dr. Iqbal, Larry Edmonds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brinkley v. GEO Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00435
Plaintiff:
Sean A. Brinkley
Defendant:
GEO Group, Inc., Noland Edmonds and E.L. Tatum, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brinkley v. Edmonds et al
as 2:2022cv00434
Plaintiff:
Sean A. Brinkley
Defendant:
Noland Edmonds, S. King and GEO Group INC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Edmonds et al
as 7:2022cv00496
Plaintiff:
Gregory Allen
Defendant:
Larry T. Edmonds and D. Bland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smarr v. Armor et al
as 1:2022cv00866
Plaintiff:
Michael Joseph Smarr
Defendant:
Armor, Harold Clarke, Mack Bailey, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edmonds v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP et al
as 3:2022cv00496
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Edmonds
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc and Patsy Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
DeFour v. Webber et al
as 7:2022cv00379
Plaintiff:
Jeremy DeFour
Defendant:
Webber, Bates, Woodson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Meherrin River Regional Jail
as 1:2022cv00152
Plaintiff:
DeAngelo Woods
Defendant:
Meherrin River Regional Jail, Kevin Cooper, Edmonds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hazell v. Edmonds
as 3:2022cv00077
Petitioner:
Che Ernest Hazell
Respondent:
Larry Edmonds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kendrick v. Edmonds
as 7:2021cv00505
Petitioner:
Richard Wade Kendrick
Respondent:
L. Edmonds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
