Cases 11 - 20 of 1,440
Ferguson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02568
Plaintiff:
Edward Ferguson
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wilhoit v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65662
Plaintiff:
Edward Wilhoit
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Edwards v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65505
Plaintiff:
April D Edwards
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Doughty v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02167
Plaintiff:
Edward James Doughty, III
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Downs v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02184
Plaintiff:
Edward L Downs, Jr.
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jones v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02126
Plaintiff:
Edward Jones
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith v. Bolinger et al.
as 5:2024cv00787
Plaintiff:
DeAerre Smith
Defendant:
Joshua Bolinger, Deputy McCutcheon, Becky McCutcheon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Edwards v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02088
Plaintiff:
Daniel Edwards
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith v. Bolinger et al.
as 5:2024cv00784
Plaintiff:
DeAerre Smith and Smurk
Defendant:
Joshua Bolinger, Deputy McCutcheon, Becky McCutcheon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. Manning et al
as 1:2024cv00262
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Edwards
Defendant:
Jay Manning and Davyne Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
