Cases 11 - 20 of 106
Clervrain et al v. Garland et al
as 6:2021cv00326
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain and Francis Cobbina Osei-Fosu
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, John M. O'Connor, Paul B. Hunker, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burke v. City of Tulsa et al
as 4:2021cv00404
Plaintiff:
Michele D Burke
Defendant:
City of Tulsa, The, G T Bynum, Mark Swinney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis v. Lawson et al
as 5:2021cv00404
Respondent:
Lonnie Lawson and William S Key Correctional Center
Petitioner:
Jerry Kent Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ellis v. Lawson
as 5:2021cv00449
Respondent:
Lonnie Lawson
Petitioner:
Jerry Kent Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ellis et al v. Love's Travel Stops & Country Stores Inc
as 5:2021cv00308
Defendant:
Love's Travel Stops & Country Stores Inc
Plaintiff:
JD Ellis
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Ellis et al v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 4:2021cv00076
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Plaintiff:
Randall Ellis and Teri Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Unser v. Constitution et al
as 5:2020cv01120
Defendant:
Constitution, Oklahoma State Election Board and United States of America
Plaintiff:
Donna Rena Ellis Unser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 5:2020cv01263
Plaintiff:
Kimberlea E Ellis Jones
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Ellis v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2020cv00293
Plaintiff:
Malcolm D. Ellis
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Department of Transportation v. United States Department of the Interior, Division of Indian Affairs et al
as 6:2020cv00361
Defendant:
Lindmark Signs, Lonnie Taylor, Bertha Mae Ward and others
Plaintiff:
Department of Transportation
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 0357
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
