Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Emery v. Franke et al
as 2:2018cv00257
Defendant:
Noah Berry, Lavelle H. Braun, Ted Chase and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Emery, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Berryhill
as 6:2017cv01477
Defendant:
Nancy Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Colin Emery Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision
Amacher v. City of Lake Oswego et al
as 3:2017cv00614
Plaintiff:
Lola Amacher
Defendant:
Rob Amsberry, City of Lake Oswego and Emery & Sons Construction Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Emery v. Skinner et al
as 2:2016cv00402
Defendant:
Brian Bellegue, Mike Gower, Mr. Joseph and others
Plaintiff:
William Vernon Emery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Emery v. Premo et al
as 6:2015cv01227
Defendant:
Nurse Ann, T. Bailey, T. Byerly and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Emery, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Emery v. Premo et al
as 6:2014cv00285
Defendant:
C. Coffey, Dr. Dewsnup, M.F. Gower and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Emery, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Emery v. State of Oregon et al
as 6:2013cv02170
Plaintiff:
Robert Emery
Defendant:
State of Oregon et al
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young et al v. State of Oregon et al
as 6:2013cv02039
Defendant:
All Other BHU Specislist/Counselors, All Stock Holders, c/o Anderson and others
Plaintiff:
David R. Bartol, Matthew J. Cross, Robert Emery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chandler v. Williams et al
as 3:2008cv00962
Defendant:
Brigitte Amsberry, Greg Clark, Assistant Chief Greg Clark and others
Plaintiff:
David George Chandler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holmes v. Schachtsick et al
as 6:2007cv00929
Plaintiff:
Leonard C. Holmes, II
Defendant:
M Schachtsick, G Emery, B. Amsberry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
