Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv04532
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
SHELLER, PC v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 2:2015cv00440
Plaintiff:
SHELLER, PC
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, SYLVIA MATHEWS BURWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
SMITH v. FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 2:2012cv06902
Plaintiff:
A. LUKE SMITH
Defendant:
FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
SMITH v. FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 2:2012cv05141
Plaintiff:
A. LUKE SMITH
Defendant:
FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
HURT et al v. FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, ET. AL.
as 2:2012cv04760
Plaintiff:
TYRONE HURT and SIDNEY M. WOLFE
Defendant:
FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, ET. AL.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NASH v. PRESIDENT OF UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2012cv02648
Plaintiff:
AASIM NASH
Defendant:
PRESIDENT OF UNITED STATES, GOVENOR OF PENNSYLVANIA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JEROME STEVENS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. v. FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION
as 2:2008mc00026
Plaintiff:
JEROME STEVENS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Defendant:
FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: Motion for Enforcement
Daniels v. Deleon et al
as 3:2007cv00018
Plaintiff:
Ernest M. Daniels
Defendant:
Doctor Deleon, Eli Lilly & Company, Food and Drug Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
