Cases 11 - 20 of 44
Wells Fargo Bank National Association v. Robertson et al
as 7:2011cv03769
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank National Association
Defendant:
Kent Robertson , Alisa Robertson , Benjamin M Ponder and others
Cross_claimant:
Kent Robertson and Alisa Robertson
Cross_defendant:
Benjamin M Ponder and Robin G Ponder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Buckley v. Schwarzenegger et al
as 3:2011cv04523
Plaintiff:
Antonio Cortez Buckley
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger, L. Ornelas, L. Locke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Castro et al v. Bowman et al
as 3:2011cv02080
Plaintiff:
Luis Castro
Defendant:
Robert Bowman, Matthew Cates, Anthony Hedgpeth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellington v. State of California et al
as 5:2011cv01507
Plaintiff:
Marcus Ruben Ellington
Defendant:
State of California, J. Brown, Director of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Prison Health Care Receivership et al
as 3:2011cv01387
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Lamont Taylor
Respondent:
Prison Health Care Receivership, G. Ponder, Ramey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Taylor v. Rendon et al
as 3:2011cv01386
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Lamont Taylor
Respondent:
Rendon, Beam, Denise E. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Aaron McCoy v. Mike Evans, et al
as 11-15311
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AARON D. MCCOY
Defendant - Appellee:
MIKE EVANS, Warden, G. PONDER, LUTES and others
Ellington v. State of California et al
as 5:2011cv00287
Plaintiff:
Marcus R. Ellington
Defendant:
State of California, J. Brown, Director of Correction's and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armando Ortiz v. Suzan Hubbard, et al
as 10-16474
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARMANDO R. ORTIZ
Defendant - Appellee:
SUZAN HUBBARD, M. S. EVANS, M. MOORE and others
Tufono v. Ortega et al
as 5:2010cv01685
Plaintiff:
Arvello L. Tufono
Defendant:
V. Ortega, B. Hopkins, Eloy Medina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
