Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Elfers v. Gonzalez et al
as 1:2020cv00213
Defendant:
Richard A. Gonzalez, Brett J. Hart, Edward M. Liddy and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Elfers
Nominal Defendant:
AbbVie, Inc.
Elfers v. Gonzalez et al
as 1:2019cv00934
Defendant:
Richard A. Gonzalez, Brett J. Hart, Edward M. Liddy and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Elfers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brown v. Gonzalez et al
as 1:2019cv00617
Defendant:
William J Chase, Melody B Meyer, Edward J Rapp and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Brown
Ellis v. Gonzalez et al
as 1:2017cv02638
Plaintiff:
Kyle Ellis
Defendant:
Richard A. Gonzalez, Robert J. Alpern, Roxanne S. Austin and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Scotto v. Smiesk et al
as 8:2016cv02941
Plaintiff:
Livia M. Scotto
Defendant:
Jeff Smiesk, Brett Hart, Oscar Munoz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Gu v. Claybaugh et al
as 5:2016cv02106
Defendant:
Nancy Claybaugh, Pharmacyclics, Inc., Edward M. Liddy and others
Plaintiff:
Diane B. Gu
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Anthony Williams v. UAL, Inc., et al
as 13-15299
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY L. WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
UAL, INC., GLENN F. TILTON, WILLIAM KING, (Ron) and others
Anthony Williams v. UAL, Inc., et al
as 12-16794
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY L. WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
UAL, INC., GLENN F. TILTON, WILLIAM KING, (Ron) and others
Williams v. UAL, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv03781
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Williams
Defendant:
UAL, Inc. , Glenn F. Tilton, William (Ron) King and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Public School Retirement System Of The School District Of Kansas City, Missouri, v. White et al
as 1:2012cv00355
Defendant:
Miles D. White, H. Laurance Fuller, Roxanne S. Austin and others
Plaintiff:
Public School Retirement System Of The School District Of Kansas City, Missouri, derivatively on behalf of Nominal Defendant Abbott Laboratories
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
