Cases 11 - 20 of 168
Ninth Amendment Party Association et al v. Rambosk et al
as 2:2023cv00830
Plaintiff:
Ninth Amendment Party Association and Milton Gerard Esquibel
Defendant:
Kevin Rambosk, Clovis Watson, Jr., Scotty Rhoden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Grant v. Judd et al
as 8:2023cv02230
Plaintiff:
Hewitt A. Grant, II
Defendant:
Grady Judd and Paul Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hart v. Judd et al
as 8:2023cv02133
Plaintiff:
Randy Hart and Randy Allen Hart
Defendant:
Grady Judd, FNU Fain, FNU Spencer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hart v. Judd
as 8:2023cv02079
Plaintiff:
Randy Allen Hart
Defendant:
Sheriff Grady Judd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hart v. Judd
as 8:2023cv02070
Plaintiff:
Randy Allen Hart
Defendant:
Sheriff Grady Judd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Seaman v. Fleurjean et al
as 8:2023cv01060
Plaintiff:
Donna Ann Seaman
Defendant:
Marc Fleurjean, Jonathan Morales, Christopher Covey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lopez Fernandez v. Judd et al
as 8:2023cv00950
Plaintiff:
Carmelo Lopez Fernandez
Defendant:
Grady Judd and William Galloway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaffer v. Scarborough et al
as 8:2023cv00680
Plaintiff:
Shaun Shaffer
Defendant:
Jacob Scarborough and Grady Judd
Not Classified By Court:
Gregory P. Holder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LoRusso v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al (Polk County)
as 8:2023cv00118
Petitioner:
Michael Anthony LoRusso
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Grady Judd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv02954
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
