Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00911
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
PERRY v. GREGORY et al
as 1:2018cv03373
Defendant:
THOMPSON, KELLY DURM, GADDIS and others
Plaintiff:
JASON SETH PERRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scruggs v. Mangold et al
as 3:2018cv00758
Undetermined:
WABASH VALLEY E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Defendant:
Cell-Extraction Member #2, Cell-Extraction Member #1, CO Mangold and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher L Scruggs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PERRY v. BUTTS et al
as 1:2018cv02320
Defendant:
KELLY DURM, ROBERTSON, MYRA STROBEL and others
Plaintiff:
JASON SETH PERRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GADDIS v. COOK MEDICAL LLC et al
as 1:2017cv03674
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
YVETTE D. GADDIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1407 Products Liability
GADDIE v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2016cv03179
Petitioner:
ROBERT GADDIE
Respondent:
LAURIE JOHNSON and BRUCE LEMMON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ILLINOIS FARMERS INSURANCE COMPANY v. PHELPS et al
as 1:2014cv02018
Defendant:
RUSSELL GADDY, SARAH GADDY and CHARLES R. PHELPS, JR.
Plaintiff:
ILLINOIS FARMERS INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
GADDIS v. COLVIN
as 1:2013cv01262
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Plaintiff:
JOHN GADDIS
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
GADDIE v. KNIGHT
as 1:2011cv01595
Petitioner:
ROBERT GADDIE
Respondent:
STAN KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ADP, INC. DEALER SERVICES GROUP et al v. BILL GADDIS CHRYSLER PLYMOUTH, INC.
as 1:2011cv00475
Plaintiff:
ADP COMMERCIAL LEASING, LLC and ADP, INC. DEALER SERVICES GROUP
Defendant:
BILL GADDIS CHRYSLER PLYMOUTH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
