Cases 11 - 20 of 41
Young v. Garland et al
as 3:2023cv01038
Plaintiff:
Timothy Doyle Young
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Michael Horowitz, O.I.G. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Long et al v. Garland et al
as 3:2023cv00710
Plaintiff:
Steven B. Long and Martin H. Stanwood
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Steven Dettelbach and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Long et al v. Garland et al
as 3:2023cv00644
Plaintiff:
Steven Long and Martin Hobart Stanwood
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Steven Dettelbach and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00479
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00296
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 706 Administrative Procedures Act(Judicial Review)
Ortega v. Rosenblum et al
as 3:2023cv00125
Petitioner:
Michael Ortega
Respondent:
Ellen Rosenblum and Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Giffen v. Biden et al
as 3:2023cv00095
Petitioner:
Todd Giffen
Respondent:
Joseph Biden, Merrick Garland and Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01892
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Swanson v. DOJ et al
as 6:2022cv01304
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Swanson and Michael Swanson
Defendant:
DOJ, Michael Mosman, Youlee Yim You and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Porter v. Garland et al
as 3:2022cv01178
Plaintiff:
Craig J. Porter
Defendant:
Merrick Garland and Steven Dettelbach
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
