Cases 11 - 20 of 26
F & V Corporation v. 67 Designs, LLC et al
as 3:2022cv00607
Plaintiff:
F & V Corporation doing business as Bulletpoint Mounting Solutions
Defendant:
67 Designs, LLC, Wild West Investments, LLC and Gavin Stener
Counter Defendant:
F & V Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Gavin v. CR Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2022cv00649
Plaintiff:
Liberty Gavin
Defendant:
CR Bard Incorporated and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Perdew v. The Mason City School Board
as 1:2021cv00732
Plaintiff:
Edward L. Perdew
Defendant:
Charles Gavin, Connie Yingling, Desiree Batsche and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv05392
Plaintiff:
Robert Gavin Turner
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gavin et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv04867
Plaintiff:
Alan Gavin and Michelle Gavin
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McCracken v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00898
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Gavin T. McCracken
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Loonsfoot v. CR Bard et al
as 2:2019cv04802
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and CR Bard
Plaintiff:
Gavin Loonsfoot
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gavin v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00256
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Christopher Gavin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv03042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Emlich et al v. OhioHealth Corporation et al
as 2:2014cv01697
Plaintiff:
William F. Emlich, Jr. and Associates in Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Inc.
Defendant:
OhioHealth Corporation, Doctors Hospital, Doctors Health Corporation of Nelsonville and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
